On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:12:57PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after > >> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really > >> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not > >> well accepted. > > > Bullshit. In my case I don't have the energy nor time to actively backport > > this. > > I used to lurve fights on Fridays. Please be ruder!
LOL! Thanks, Angus. -- Enrico
