Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | Dear all,
| > | | | | The scons-based building system is now available from svn.
| > Currently,
| > | | Please revert.
| > | | We are not going to have two competing build systems!
| > And to expand a bit:
| > I do welcome the effort to see if the current build system is
| | I don't think your wording is very welcoming, to quote you: "I hate it
| already", "please revert", "I don't care one iota", etc...

It seems that when I try to be nice no one listens so I have to enter
the playing field with over-strong wordings.

If you say nothing it's difficult to listen to you Lars. _I_ think Bo should have waited for your approval before committing. But there were a general agreement in the list three days ago that if we promise to keep the auto stuff up to date, A few Sconscript in trunk is OK.

"I don't think it is prudent to add scons to trunk as you have done.
Can you please revert it. You may work on a branch until you have
shown that scons can indeed fill the boots of the autotools."

But I must admit that the scons commit frustrated me...

I can understand that.

Abdel.

Reply via email to