Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I would advise you to don't push for SVN inclusion in trunk for now. > | At least not until Cmake is at least on par with Scons. But don't be > | discouraged though, I guess we can put it in a SVN branch. > > Having it in trunk is not a problem as long as it does not "pollute" > the tree. We managed to shuffle scons away into developement, can the > same be done with cmake? >
At the moment all files reside in one folder and they must be copied into the tree before building. So it only pollutes the checkout not svn. But when I'm the only one who works on cmake, then it makes no sense to add the files. First I would like to see how good the project files are which scons generates. If they are useless then one argument for cmake remains. Peter
