Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
> | > Have you proof from the profiler that this is necessary?
> | 
> | The patch has already been dropped because of my profiling,
> | see the end of the thread.
> | 
> | But I will test the same trick for the text function,
> | then the most used function of LyX is not virtual any more.
> 
> I am not sure that template tricks is the way to go.
> 
> And the gain will always be minimal, but go after the huge offenders
> instead of micro-optimizations that makes the code more complex and
> the binaries larger.

I'm not proposing such a patch ATM, I'm only interested in the
costs of such an additional virtual call.

Peter

Reply via email to