Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > Have you proof from the profiler that this is necessary? > | > | The patch has already been dropped because of my profiling, > | see the end of the thread. > | > | But I will test the same trick for the text function, > | then the most used function of LyX is not virtual any more. > > I am not sure that template tricks is the way to go. > > And the gain will always be minimal, but go after the huge offenders > instead of micro-optimizations that makes the code more complex and > the binaries larger.
I'm not proposing such a patch ATM, I'm only interested in the costs of such an additional virtual call. Peter