>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> If we go the macro way (and we should be very careful about Lars> this), then we should go even a bit further. Lars> We should then use a macro that adds the BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, Lars> and __FILE__ and __LINE__ always to the debug output. Yes, maybe. Lars> But that would be in a completely other set of patches. Definitely. But does your answer mean you are not opposed to it? | and get rid of all debug output at compile time. Lars> Perhaps, but note that we do this in exaclye zero places as of Lars> today. (we always keep debug output compiled in. Which is nice Lars> imho.) I agree there is little need for this. I was just pointing out some consequences (although it would be nice to know how much space and maybe time this stuff uses). JMarc
