On 13 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> In fact what you want here is a branch and not a mere tag. It is
> created with "cvs tag -b".
Okay, I'll explore the man page a bit deeper on this.
> What are the files you updated?
Everything was updated before I attempted the tag/branch, and the branch
and head are still identical for now.
> Do you really want to keep them in a branch right now? We could wait
> until we do have changes intended to 1.2.0 only. Do you plan to do it
> soon?
The branch is needed now. Others have contributed some 1.2.0-specific
changes, and I've had some recent success compiling the CVS versions, so
it is time to start writing for 1.2.0. However, should there be a
1.1.6fix3, I would like to have the worst mistakes in the docs cleaned up
for it (e.g. File->View DVI should be View->DVI, etc.). That is the
intention of 1_1_6-updates.
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
