On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Amir Karger wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 06:35:35PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:34:00PM -0500, George De Bruin wrote: > > > > > (This would bring up a whole *other* issue of what we need to document for > > > different interfaces...) > > > > This is a very difficult problem for the manuals. Already qt2 and xforms > > differ rather a lot on certain dialogs. > > Is it the sort of thing that would be impossible to write in a separate qt2 > manual? Hm, I guess so, if the basic way a dialog works is going to be > different in the different systems.
Aiighh! I smell disaster in the air! Are the xforms/qt2 differences just because qt2 hasn't "caught up" to the xforms style yet, or are the differences truly permanent? This will make the CUA vs. emacs keybindings issue seem utterly trivial if they are permanently different. For now, let's declare the xforms version to be "correct", and the only one to be documented. When the qt2 version is considered to be mature, then perhaps a chapter of qt2 differences can be written while we debate whether it needs it's own document. I really and truly hope not. Mike -- Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
