What is the difference between mustn't and may not/cannot? Mustn't = may not, or am I wrong?
The reason I didn't like 'Mustn't' is that it sounds too much like spoken language, i.e. slang.
As for the semantic difference of 'may not', 'cannot' and 'must not', you need to ask someone with a more conscious knowledge of English grammar :-( I used to know this stuff, but that was well over a decade ago.
We should let the "natives" decide this --- any natives out there? ;-)
OK.
* Added this to the preamble: % Set nicer fonts for PDF-output \usepackage[scaled=0.92]{helvet} \usepackage{mathptmx} \usepackage{courier} so that the PDF file's fonts don't look crappy
I can't compile the doc when I use \usepackage{mathptmx} some tfm fonts couldn't be loaded, probably due to the table in chapter 6.6.3. Has anybody the same problem?
I get a warning:
dvips: Warning: missing glyph `dotlessj'
when I do View->PDF and use 'mathptmx', but that's all.
Astonishing, because we don't have a dotless j in our document.
Another way is to use ae in Layout->Document->Layout->Font
Or times (which also gives 'missing ... dotlessj'. But Herbert keeps saying these options are depreceated. OTOH, what he recommends is maybe not available on all systems...
I'll ask Herbert.
BTW. I've installed ghostview 4.5 and it doesn't look pixeld.
The PDF output looks ok when you use ghostview 3.5.8 as well, but not when you use Acroread... then it's crappy regardless if I use View-PDF, View->PDF (dvipdfm) or View->PDF (pdflatex).
I'm using tetex 2.02 and ghostscript 8.00.
Acroread 5.x is very buggy. The font display for bitmap fonts is fixed in Acroread 6.x, which is available for Windows since 9 Months. But there is no Linux version, I don't know why.
Question: Should we add a list of tables and a list of figures? I'm guessing there aren't many figures, but maybe there are some tables?
No, this will only introduce four extra empty pages. Because we have only three pictures and three tables.
