On 10.06.05, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
> "G. Milde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 9.06.05, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
> >> | On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, G. Milde wrote:
> >> >> > G> ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the
> >> >> > G> expected arguments).
> | Currently, in LyXAction.C are lines like
> | { LFUN_WRITEAS, "buffer-write-as", ReadOnly },
> | If these lines where completed by comments as e.g.
> | { LFUN_WRITEAS, "buffer-write-as", ReadOnly }, // (filename), write buffer
> to new file
> No... we really should encode this information in the lfun definition.
> IMHO both a short textual description, and what arguments to expect
> and their type.
> If we have this information attached to the lfun a doc tool could
> extract it easily. but just adding comments... no not in favour.
Accepted. Nice. Better. I just did not dare to ask for this.
> And all of this is 1.5 stuff anyway.
Does this mean I have to wait another 2 years for documented lfuns (or could
this possibly also go to 1.4.x)?
G�nter
--
G.Milde web.de
