Hi James,
Please keep the discussion on the ML so that others can contribute, too.


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:42 PM, James S. Cavenaugh
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> Thanks for your reply.  I may do that eventually, but as I wrote, I'm just
> now reading the UserGuide and so I am very, very far from being a skillful
> Lyx user.  I did just come across what I think is another mistake, however,
> and I'd like to point this out too.  I have no idea how to fix this at this
> time; I can only point it out.
>
When you point out UserGuide under Section 3.4.3, "Vertical Space
(0.3cm)", this is part of the LyX machinery. To change strings at this
level one should open a ticket on our tracker:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome


> In Section 5.1.6 (User Guide, Operators with Limits), I believe from the
> text and similar math notation elsewhere that the limits to the summation
> shown in the displayed formula example are supposed to be above and below
> the capital sigma, but they're not—they're to the right just as they are in
> the inline version.  In playing around with this tool the only way I can see
> to get the desired look is with stackrelthree, i.e. make three empty boxes
> and fill them in separately, with the middle box being a capital sigma.  Is
> there an easier way to do this?
>
I wouldn't know. This is perhaps a question suitable for lyx-users.

Regards,
Liviu


> Thanks,
> James
>
>
> On 8/27/2015 1:15 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>
>> Dear James,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:50 PM, James S. Cavenaugh
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since Lyx is concerned with automatically applying correct styles, I want
>>> to
>>> point out an instance of very bad style in the UserGuide. I'm still
>>> reading
>>> this and so there may likely be many more such examples, but this will
>>> suffice to illustrate a very, very common error in spacing that pervades
>>> English prose. It's as common as it is wrong. The SI rules very clearly
>>> specify that there should be a space between a number and a unit, but
>>> often
>>> this space is omitted, and that's just plain wrong.
>>>
>> You are clearly interested in fixing these issues. Please consider
>> taking the user guide, enable Change Tracking, correct the issues that
>> you can spot, and forward the corrected document to this list. Then
>> our docs maintainer will consider including the changes in our repo.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Liviu
>>
>>
>>>   Look up the SI rules if
>>> you don't believe me.  By the way, they're international, so this isn't
>>> some
>>> Americanism or whatever.  Unfortunately, scientists and other educated
>>> people are as ignorant of these rules as anybody else, but the rules are
>>> actually quite sensible.
>>>
>>> Anyway, in the UserGuide under Section 3.4.3, you have an example with a
>>> table, and the example shows a diagram with Vertical Space (0.3cm) — note
>>> that the quantity in parentheses definitely should be "0.3 cm" and not
>>> "0.3cm".
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> James S. Cavenaugh, Ph.D.
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Do you think you know what math is?
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02
Or what it means to be intelligent?
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30
Think again:
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library

Reply via email to