for whatever reason, this very message was not filtered by kmail. However, I
don't want to bother the list with a too long thread and I will no more answer
on this subject on the list, many thanks for all that gave help.
On mer, 29 sep 1999, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes � �crit
>jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| look at this header received as an answer to my question. There is absolutly no
>| reference to lyx-user, probably because it was a direct answer, but if a tag
>| was present in the initial subject, it would be filtered correctly
>|
>| the to field if often usefull, the cc also, but this is not adressing the
>| problem completely. I subscribe to many (id 13!) mailing list, lyx is the only
>| one not setting a tag in the subject.
>|
>| Well, I won't kill you for that, I appreciate lyx too much!
>
>If you have a smart mailreader you still can look at the References
>and Msg-Id fields. It is just a cheap excuse for bad mailreaders if
>you have to have a tag in the subject to be able to filter the mail.
>
>AND if you choose to send the mail to you directly rather than also
>cc/to to the list that has probaly a reason, and you should not treat
>the mail is if it came on the list.
>
>I guess I�am subscribing to around 20 mailing lists and do not have
>the problems you are having...
>
> Lgb
--
Linux hp-41 APTEP SF
http://perso.club-internet.fr/jdanield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
