Sounds like someone's opinion to me.  Depending on the type of document,
audience, etc., they should be perfectly acceptable and serve distinct purposes
(as your example implies).  I don't recall ever seeing rules on their use in
my grammar book either... :)

Kenward

On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:54:54PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
...
> make me confused. The author seems to be rather 
> radical and quite strange to my taste. Would be 
> willing and ready knowingly comment on his two 
> doctrines?
> 
> 1) You should NEVER (literarily) use vertical 
> rules in a table.
> 
> 2) You should NEVER (nearly) use double rules in 
> a table.
> 
> The second issue doesn't bother me, but the 
> first one seems to me quite strange. What about 
> following table?
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
>          |head     head2      head3
> ----------------------------------------------
> 1st item | data    data2      data3
> 2nd item | data    data2      data3
> 3rd item | data    data2      data3
> 4th item | data    data2      data3
> ----------------------------------------------

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--

Reply via email to