> wfischer:
> The output then looks like this: blah [1][2]
> when it ought to be this: blah [1-2]
Herbert Voss:
it's not usual to write it this way, when there are only
two citations, therefore always [1,2], but [1-3].
. . .
Yes, but, one doesn't get [1,2], but rather [1][2].
Likewise, one gets [1][2][3] instead of [1-3].
Herbert Voss:
do you use package{cite}?
I'm using package{natbib}, so the actual citations are formatted
differently, but the content is the same.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reports that:
> the citation dialog was completely rewritten, and it is now very
> easy to add/change several citations inside a single citation
> inset.
So this complaint of mine may vanish in the next release ...
which is, um, going to be when? About?
____________________________________________________________
Will Fischer
Biology Department [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indiana University Lab: 812-855-2549
Jordan Hall 142 FAX: 812-855-6705
1001 E. Third Street
Bloomington, IN 47405-3700 USA
