"Lars Gullik Bj�nnes" wrote: > > FUD, gcc-2.96 works just perfect. > Lars, you're absolutely right. gcc-2.96 are so much better in compiling C++ stuff (although the one shipped with RH7 is pretty crappy, which I believed was 2.96-54). > > Your XForms dist is too old. Get a newer one. > (but still 0.88 or try 0.89 if you want to) > Whoa! Again, you're right on the dot! ;-) I've installed 0.89 and everything is perfect! Thanks from a loyal user!! (can't wait for the GTK beta!!) -- Wai-Sun "Squidster" Chia Unix/Web Developer Professional Services
- Symbols of Laplace and Fourier transform Koh, YounSuk
- Re: Symbols of Laplace and Fourier transform Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem Wai-Sun Chia
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem Andre Juffer
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile prob... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile... Wai-Sun Chia
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile... Svante Signell
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile... Svante Signell
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 com... Allan Rae
- xforms 0.89 (was: Re: 1... Wai-Sun Chia
- Re: xforms 0.89 (was: R... Paul E Johnson
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7... Svante Signell
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7... Svante Signell
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile... Svante Signell
