On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
>
> > You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
> > with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> > 0.88-9
>
> This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
> need to, which breaks the compile. I've just sent a patch to document this
> in the INSTALL file :)
>
> thanks
> john
>
> --
> "...except Alan Cox, but he's actually not human, but about
> a thousand gnomes working in under-ground caves in Swansea."
> - Linus Torvalds
>
>
Note that the solution suggested was to use an _earlier_ version of
xforms, while your patch says to get a more recent one. I can vouch for
0.88-9 (works for me here). I think that there were problems with 0.89-0
or something. Perhaps we should document the specific xforms versions we
know about, in addition to the general 'use a more recent version'
statement ?
Lior.
