2014-11-13 15:38 GMT+01:00 Ernesto Posse:
> Thanks. That is what I want to achieve and your example does accomplish
> this, but I don't understand why using the first form of "Argument"
> declaration in the layout file, without 'post:', the second argument to the
> command is always the text from the work area, this is,
>
> \command{arg1}{work area text}{arg2}{arg3} ...
>
> I understand that's what 'post:' does, but without it, I obtain the same
> result. What if I want to generate the following?
>
> \command{arg1}{arg2}{arg3}{work area text}
>
If you do not use post:, you need to stick with the pre numbering, that is
Argument 1
Mandatory 1
LabelString "CR number"
EndArgument
Argument 2
Mandatory 1
LabelString "Sub-Category"
EndArgument
Argument 3
LabelString "Subject Descriptor"
EndArgument
> In my particular case, it seems to me that there is no particularly good
> reason why the "category" field should be treated differently than the
> others (CR code, sub-category, subject).
>
Maybe you are looking for a flex inset rather than a style?
>
> Also, why doesn't the "Mandatory 0" flag work? I would expect it to
> produce an argument enclosed in [...], not in {...}.
>
Works for me. Although it is superfluous (Mandatory is false by default).
Jürgen
>
> Thanks
>
> PS: The style I want to use is ACM small journals (
> http://www.acm.org/publications/submissions/latex_style). I'm not sure if
> it's the same as the one for SIG proceedings, but I'm guessing there will
> be some differences.
>
