Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2016 um 11:33:58, schrieb Michael Berger <[email protected]>
> > Was it a mistake not to remove texlive2013 first because I cannot call
> > tlmgr? 
> 
> No mistake.
> 'tlmgr' should be in your path now as 
> '/usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr'
> 
> > How can I test the new texlive2016 installation?
> 
> # which latex
> should give you /usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/latex.
> 
> > Michael
> 
>         Kornel
> 
> Hi Kornel,
> thanks for your advice.
> 
> 'tlmgr' is indeed here '/usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr'
> however, it points to: '../../texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pl'

Which is correct. You can see it if you try 'ls -lL 
/usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr', which shows, that
the link points to a real file.

> I recall now that I tried to somehow activate 'tlmgr.pl' under the 
> texlive2013 installation and created a simbolic link:
> '/usr/share/texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/tlmgr.pl /bin/tlmgr.pl'

This is not part of TL2016, but is part of your old installation (package 
texlive-base)

> Should I remove that link with: 'rm -f /bin/tlmgr.pl' ?

It points to wrong entry anyway.

> # which latex
> returns: '/usr/bin/latex

This is your old latex, e.g. wrong.
It means your PATH setting is not correct.
The path '/usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux' should appear *before* 
'/usr/bin' in yoyr PATH environment.

Check it again with 'where latex'.

> Kindly advise how to fix all this and I am very sorry for the trouble I am 
> causing!
> 
> Michael

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to