I see that this small bug has been fixed with 2.2.1.
Yet there still is a small glitch: when I hit "Go back" I am really back to
where I was, but the "Ok" button is greyed out, so to insert the reference
I have to select a different one and then reselect the previous (if it was
the correct one, of course).


2016-06-08 16:46 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>:

> On 06/08/2016 03:46 AM, Mario D wrote:
>
> 2016-06-07 1:43 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>:
>
>> On 06/06/2016 04:57 AM, Mario D wrote:
>> > After opening the dialog box to insert a reference to a label, when  a
>> > label is chosen there is a button  "Go to label" in order to check
>> > whether  the label is really the correct one. Good.
>> > After having hit this button, it is replaced with "Go back", so that I
>> > can get to the original point after having checked the label. Ok.
>> >
>> > The only drawback, in this, is that when I am back to the original
>> > point the label I checked is no longer selected, so that now I know
>> > whether it was the right one or not but, possibly, I don't remember
>> > its name...  :(
>> >
>> > Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> No, this is definitely a shortcoming. The attached patch fixes this
>> behavior, but it seems like a bit of a hack.
>>
>> Anyone have a better idea? I could introduce a new variable for this
>> purpose, but that seems like overkill.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
> Thank you.
>
> Ok, now there are (to me) two interesting patches: this one and the other
> concerning moving and selecting with ctrl+arrows: is there any chance to
> see these implemented in a future minor release or should I start thinking
> about recompiling on my own?
>
>
> This one will go into 2.2.2 at least, and probably into 2.2.1. We're
> waiting to see if some major problem with 2.2.0 arises that requires a very
> fast release. If so, then 2.2.1 will contain only really serious fixes. If
> not, then it will contain more. It looks as if the latter is what will
> happen, but we'll only make a decision after the release of 2.1.5.
>
> Richard
>
>
>

Reply via email to