On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck <rikih...@lyx.org>
wrote:

> On 05/11/2018 03:37 PM, Jim Rockford wrote:
> > In my 20+ years in the world of science, I have not known a single
> > user of Lyx (~50 in total) who wasn't computer savvy.  Why not just
> > include a warning message that Lyx 2.3.0 may not function properly
> > with MiKTeX distributions that have not been updated as recently as
> > some specific date?
>
> That is more or less what was proposed by most of the development team:
> A warning at start-up, that LyX was going to update MikTeX, with an
> option for the user to abort the install if they wish. The person
> responsible for the Windows packages refused to include such a warning,
> and we did not think updating people's other software without asking
> permission to do so was something we should do. So that has left us in a
> bad position.
>
> We are working now to try to produce a Windows installer. Unfortunately,
> none of the active development team use Windows, so it is taking longer
> than it otherwise might. We'd certainly welcome help from someone who
> does use Windows.
>
> Riki
>
>
>
>
And this is why I couldn't care less about MikTeX and have been using
TeXlive on my Windoze installations for a while. Is it possible to give the
alternative to use Texlive instead of MikTex?

Reply via email to