Am Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:30:29 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Rich Shepard <[email protected]>:
> This is a new issue with kbibtex. Technical report reference in the
> bibliography include the document type, Tech. rept., even though that's not
> in the bibtex source in the kbibtex database. Three examples of the output
> and their source listings (minus the abstracts):
>
> Brinson, M.M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Tech.
> rept. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways
> Experiment Station.
Checking TL19 I found some .bst files containing this string.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/uestcthesis/uestcthesis.bst:1687: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/seuthesis/seuthesis.bst:1685: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/authordate/authordate1.bst:570: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/authordate/authordate3.bst:570: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/authordate/authordate4.bst:571: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/authordate/authordate2.bst:571: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
./texmf-dist/doc/latex/seuthesis/zharticle/zharticle.bst:1684: { "Tech.
rept." } % ODWE abbrevs.
...
> Since the string, 'Tech. rept.' does not appear in the bibtex source I don't
> know where to look to find why it appears in the compiled document's
> bibliography. All ideas welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
Kornel
pgpkgeljkExYp.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
