On Thursday 21 February 2002 13:33, Arnold Christensen wrote:
>
> On a line where "style" is SGML instead of standard, I've wrote the
> following, but filename needs to be absolute, or else
> Latex can not find it:
>
> <figure loc="here"><eps file="/path/to/filename/file.ps"></figure>
>
> somehow caption will not work yet...
Ok, the relevant part in the dtd is:
<!element figure - - ((eps | ph ), img*, caption?)>
<!attlist figure
loc cdata "tbp"
caption cdata "Caption">
<!-- eps attributes added by mb and td -->
<!element eps - o empty >
<!attlist eps
file cdata #required
height cdata "5cm"
angle cdata "0">
<!element ph - o empty >
<!attlist ph
vspace cdata #required>
<!element img - o empty>
<!attlist img
src cdata #required>
<!element caption - o (%inline)>
So the loc attribute in figure is the location.
I can guess what eps means, but ph?
So looking to the latex transformation file I see that ph is transformed as:
<ph> + "\\vspace{[VSPACE]}\n\\par" +
</ph>
So this means that ph is in reality a vertical space. But why call it ph???
One of those, eps or ph, is mandatory, then it comes the img element. What
does it means img here, not an eps image?
Ok, reading the html transformation file I see that it is used with html.
The last element is the caption that is optional.
Looking again to the latex transforming file I would expect it to work.
What is the problem with it? I have been able to make it work.
So we want to output something like this:
<figure loc="here">
<eps file="/home/jamatos/lyx/devel/teste/platypus.eps">
<img src="/home/jamatos/lyx/devel/teste/platypus.png">
<caption>LyX's symbol</caption>
</figure>
The eps figure is for the print version and the img is for html.
The model used for figure is really, really weird, but I can make it work.
If you are using 1.1.6 the file to look to modify is src/insets/figinset.C,
the linuxdoc function.
For 1.2 I will add the code needed to the cvs to make it work like this. Is
it ok?
> ------------
> Arnold
--
Jos� Ab�lio
