Hi, its been a long while since I last used lyx. However I dug up some old research work which worked fine under 1.16, but misbehaves in 1.2.0. Perhaps someone can tell me what has gone astray?
Lyx 1.2.0 returns the following error on all citation references which were fine under 1.16: Package natbib Warning: Citation 'jadda jadda: 1234' on page XX undefined on input line XXXX. I have tried updating the lyx files format from 2,16 to 220, but that did nothing. I deleted the bibtex reference icon from my lyx file and inserted it anew, that also didn't help. I tried the create a new lyx document with my old bib-file and in that new document I was able to insert citation references without error? I note that the citation reference insertion pop-up window has been significantly overhauled since 1.16, do all old citation references need to be reinserted in 1.2.0? I have refrained from doing this since there are hundreds of references and since I am not sure it is going to work? Has anybody come across this problem before or know of a solution? Thanks in advance. Regards Rob ################################################################################ ###### Dr. Robert K�hler B.Sc. B.Eng. (Mech) Ph.D. Institut f�r Motorenbau Prof. Huber GmbH / DaimlerChrysler AG Mercedes-Benz Technology Center Abteilung: EP/GFD Fahrdynamik / Aktive Sicherheit Werk: 59, HPC: X711 71059, Sindelfingen, Germany Tel: +49 (0)7031 90 43259 Fax: +49 (0)7031 90 43371 Mobile: +49 (0)170 1194123 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ################################################################################ ###### IMPORTANT: This e-mail is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour, or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this e-mail, although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this e-mail in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites and place it in a warm oven for 40 minutes. Whisk briefly and let it stand for two hours before icing. ################################################################################ #####
