I had a similar problem, but I was under RH 7.0: graphics would
*never* show up under Lyx 1.2.1.

This weekend I got pissed about it and after a while I came to the
idea of reinstalling ImageMagick, uploading from 5.3.3. to 5.5.*.

It worked... seems that "convert" was failing before.

In any case there is room for improvement in the way images are
handled now, because the text jumps to the beginning when a new
image is rendered, and the conversion process takes a long time
in a document with several of them. Maybe the procedures should be
reviewed somehow..

jb

> 
> >Since more than a year I have watched the list and the discussion concerning
> >the problem that LyX renders graphics only sporadically on fast computers - 
> I 
> >still have the problem and tried the sporadic tips to solve the problem - 
> >without success for SuSE 7.3 and SuSE 8.0. I have tried to update from 1.1.6
>  
> >to 1.2.1, but was unable to compile the sources - because of the cc1plus 
> >error. Now I have succeeded in part and feel that there might be somebody ou
> t 
> >there knowing the ultimate solution. Here is what I did:
> >
> >When I asked to check the dependencies, the output was:
> ># rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm
> >error: failed dependencies:
> >        tetex-xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        tetex-latex is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        libstdc++.so.5   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(Cwd)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(File::Basename)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(FileHandle)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(lib)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(strict)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >        perl(vars)   is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1
> >
> >So I installed 1.2.1 from the binary rpm using --nodeps and supplied both 
> >libstdc++.so.5.0.0 and libgcc_s.so.1 in /usr/lib (moreover, a symbolic link 
> >to libstdc++.so.5 was generated and ldconfig was run).
> >
> >Now LyX 1.2.1 works fine (even xdvi and PDF output), but I do not even see 
> >graphics sporadically any more. Instead I get an error message in each 
> >graphics box telling me that the conversion into a display format failed. In
>  
> >fact, the message is in German and reads "Fehler bei der Konvertierung in ei
> n 
> >darstellbares Format"
> >
> >Norbert
> >  
> >
> I'm in a similar (sinking) boat. In previous versions of LyX, the 
> graphics would almost always render. At most, I would just have to 
> restart LyX and rendering would work again. Now that I've installed 
> 1.2.1 for RH 8.0 and using xforms 0.89 (after upgrading to RH 8.0), 
> rendering just does NOT work at all. (Not quite true - it doesn't work 
> on eps files created by R.) This is on three Intel PCs all running RH 
> 8.0 (one is a laptop, the other two are desktop systems). I can't be 
> sure the problem doesn't have something to do with Redhat 8.0. Or it may 
> be that all the eps files I'm creating come from R (they used to render 
> OK and they are eps files.) But I cannot fix it and have seen NOTHING on 
> the list that has helped. Someone did suggest turning on debuggind ("lyx 
> -dbg graphics" or "lyx -dbg any") but that just tells me the conversion 
> doesn't work - even though all the software needed for the conversion is 
> readily available on all three systems - I can do it manually - and if 
> the conversion wasn't in the preferences I added it. LyX installed 
> differently on each system. On at least one I had to even get it to just 
> view in PS and PDF. Viewing in HTML gives a screwy message about the 
> file name having more than one period and that dvips can't handle it. I 
> have to rename the file so there is only one period. Fortunately I guess 
> I can live without rendering in LyX just so long as it prints and views OK.
> 
> Just for your information, I always use "rpm -U --test" before actually 
> installing the binary. rpm never reported any problem either in test 
> mode or when I actually installed the software. There were no conflicts 
> and it didn't complain about any missing software - LyX installed (as it 
> had in the past) without any error messages or warnings. Everything 
> seems to work except for rendering (and viewing on one system) out of 
> the box.
> 
> At least for me, the rendering error message is in English. I miss the 
> days when I could just install a new version of LyX and continue doing 
> actual work.
> 
> If anyone can explain how to fix this I would certainly appreciate it.
> 
> Rick B.
> 
> 


Reply via email to