Hello List,
the X-Windows-System knows about the "useless" window-keys, and they are
defined several times and I'm confused.
There's the keycode for the console (it's 125-127 for left Win-key,
right Win-key and menu-key)
There's the keycode for X (very different from the first)
And then the Window-keys are called "Super_L", "Super_R" and "Menu". In
the same column there's "Control_L", "Shift_R", and all these
"modifiers". (this table appears by typing "xmodmap" in a shell).
Now I think that there must be some table that tells LyX that
C means control
M means meta
and so on, because the shortcuts are defined with "C" and "M" - not with
"control" and "meta" and I've searched, but didn't find it. In this
ominous table has to be the answer to my question. You know: it's out
there - somewhere ;o)
-Kai-
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 22.56 schrieb Matej Cepl:
> On 2003-07-26, 16:16 GMT, Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> >> But I wonder if its possible to use the otherwise completely
> >> unnecessary "windows-keys" on a 105-keys-keyboard. How can I say
> >> cua.bind, that it shoul use this key for the shortcut. So all
> >> short:
> >
> > I'm guessing, as I use a Happy Hacking keyboard that doesn't have the
> > silly extra key, but I think you have to get X to recognise the
> > Windows key before you can bind it in LyX. Look into X keymaps first.
>
> Or configure keyboard in your /etc/X11/XF86Setup-4 as pc104.
>
> Matej
--
Kai Johannes Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
