On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:55:28PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> I would like to give it a try. Can it be obtained > >> separately from the lyx source? > > > I could send you a SuSE 8.3 binary for 32 bit Intel. > > 380k stripped... > > Hmmmm. > $ ldd tex2lyx > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40024000) > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x40033000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/libm.so.6 (0x400e5000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40107000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x42000000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > > Why does it depend on libz? > > Other than libz its dependencies look fine. I take it that libz is > just a function of linking against libsupport.la?
Probably. I don't believe it is needed. > Given the steady stream of people asking about tex2lyx, would it make > sense to set up separate cvs trees for both tex2lyx and lyx2lyx? They > are separate executables after all... Note that my original plan was to have them separated and then two guys came along pulling in fancy stuff from src/*.C... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
