Rich Shepard wrote: >> because 1.4.x is soooo much less kludgy in soooo many ways. >> Theoretically. In practice, it's broken and we're busy trying to fix it >> in a way that retains the elegance and doesn't introduce too many new >> kludges :) > > Angus, > > The "kludgy" comment wasn't mine.
Sure. It was mine. An accurate description of the state of the code. > In any case, we'll wait. It's a difficult > job and will be finished when you folks find the time to get it done. In > the meantime we'll continue to manually close everything opened by the > spell check. Now you're just making me feel guilty :) -- Angus
