On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:40:04PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > There is a way around this, if tex seems too limiting. A lyx macro > doesn't have to have a corresponding tex macro. Lyx could simply > expand "lyx-macros" itself when exporting tex, instead of outputting a > tex macro. That'd allow more than 10 arguments, and avoid any other > tex-specific limitation as well.
Sure enough. > I don't know if it is worth the trouble though. We are going to need some 'light' implementation of that anyway when going to XML (aka non-TeX-math). So this is already somehow on the radar screen. Not to mention the current ugly macro interface. But I somehow doubt it will be my doing, so if anybody is interested to spend some time here in the 1.5 cycle... Andre'
