Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package essential modules are missing. Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: >Jose' Matos wrote: >> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote: >>> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible >>> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires >>> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right: >>> dump the python version packed by Ruurd, if you have no use for it... >> >> Do you have any evidence of your claim? >> >> I am puzzled because we have coded lyx2lyx to require only python 1.5.2 >> (this version was released in 1999). We have not used any feature from >> later versions. >> >> If you know any such example please report it and we will fix it ASAP. > >I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package >doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of. My advice >still holds. Ruurd's python package has outlived its usefulness. All >Windows users should ditch it and get an official distribution from >www.python.org. That way we're all on the same playing field. > >-- >Angus >
