Olivier Ripoll wrote: > The only one that I had (re)defined in the preamble was oiint. So > shouldn't the wasy package/fonts be used only if AMSmath is unselected ?
I think that the wasysym documentation http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/wasysym/wasysym.pdf explains what we need to do. Executive summary: \usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysymb} Georg? 2.2 Integrals The wasy fonts provide a set of integral sybols, which comprises multiple and surface integrals, too. ? Loading the package with the option [integrals] makes the following integrals available: \int r \iint s \iiint t \oint u \oiint Notice that the style of the \int and \oint is changed, as compared with standard LATEX, and matches the other integral symbols. This works with or without the amsmath package, and the sequence of loading does not matter. ? If you prefer to stay with the integral symbols provided by LATEX(and possibly amsmath), but need other symbols from the wasy fonts, load the package with the option [nointegrals]. Doing so will neither alter any existing integral symbols nor add new ones. ? Loading the package without an option or with the option [compat1] makes the following commands for integrals available: \varint r \iint s \iiint t \varoint u \oiint v This is compatible with the behavior of wasysym version 1.x, but the package will not cooperate well with amsmath then. -- Angus
