On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:04:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> As I said: The current behaviour was implemented explicitly as > Andre> response to a very detailed user-request. > > Andre> I don't like it particularily, but I don't like the \# <-> #, > Andre> \{ <-> { business either. > > What would you do about it? I think it is confusing that it depends on > some setting that the user may not be aware of. I was thinking of > removing it, but we should provide a simple way to produce a align.
About the align/eqnarray stuff? Use eqnarray as we did until 1.2 or such. If someone wants aling he could setup a key binding on math-mutate align (or such). I'd also accept a new LFUN but don't consider this a high priority. Alternately, use eqnarray if 'no ams' is selected, 'align' when ams is forced, and disable the function when AMS detection is 'auto'. When I think about it, this might be not the worst option. Andre'