I had much help by this list recently by trying to get familiar with makebst to meet the requests of the publisher for citing references and the bibliography. However, I still have a few problems. Perhaps somebody who is experienced can help me.
I have produced with latex makebst a we.bst and we.dbj file and put it in ~/PP-buch/Bibtex-style> afterward texhash (necessary?) and selected we (.bst, not included) in the Bibtex-references popup at the end of my lyx document (koma-script book style). There were, however, some mistakes I made and I tried to correct them by changing the we.dbj file (which should later be converted to we.bst by running lated we.dbj). MY QUESTION: In the dbj file the different decisions are given as e.g.: %<<STYLE OF CITATIONS: % %: (def) Numerical as in standard LaTeX ,ay%: Author-year with some non-standard interface % ,alph%: Alpha style, Jon90 or JWB90 for single or multiple authors % ,alph,alf-1%: Alpha style, Jon90 even for multiple authors % ,alph,alf-f%: Alpha style, Jones90 (full name of first author) % ,cite%: Cite key (special for listing contents of bib file) %------\ans=a(==ay)------- I guess, I have to add % in % ,ay%: Author-year with some non-standard interface and remove the first % in the line above if I want the (def) version %: (def) Numerical as in standard LaTeX is this correct and does the second % in this line stay? Where do I have to make a change in order to get (Miller 2001) As I have it now it is (Miller (2001)) whereas cited by Miller (2001) is correct. Can I do this from outside the bst file and if not, where in the dbj would be the place for the change? makebst is a nive tool, but for the unexperienced partly not easy to understand. Unfortunately, my contribution is due soon. Thanks for help: Wolfgang
