On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:31:44AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:41:39AM +0200, Sven Schreiber wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > > > Unfortunately, backports from edgy are not possible at the moment due to > > > build-dependendency issues. > > > > > Yep, I expected something like that. > > Well I bet that this is solveable by just tweaking some things in the control > file and maybe by reverting the python policy change if it has been adopted by > Ubuntu aswell. I've done this for the sarge backport aswell and the > differences > between those Ubuntu release shouldn't be more then the differences between > Debian/sarge and what is currently Debian/testing.
Ok for the impatient here is the diff: ftp://hxt.homelinux.org/foobuntu/lyx_1.4.2-4%7edapper1.diff.gz If you've a fast machine build it on your own. My oh so slow box is still working on the binary. Oh and I'm still unsure if it's a great idea to publish binarys from a one time action only initiated to proof something. It would be a lot better if someone would publish binarys who is actually using them and who is interested in keeping them fresh and up to date. Actually im building in a chroot located in /tmp which means it will be gone with the next reboot anyway. If someone would like to care for his *buntu fellows it would be nice to step up NOW. I'm not interested at all and a little bit pissed of already by some strange emails claiming that Debian packagers are responsible for what *buntu ships. Oh slightly off-topic of course ... I should stop whiningx ;) Cheers, Sven -- If you won't forgive me the rest of my life Let me apologize while I'm still alive I know it's time to face all of my past mistakes [Less than Jake - Rest Of My Life]
