On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 "Adrian Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) > in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single > definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything > works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way > to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software.... -- David L. Johnson __o | It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can _`\(,_ | only be cured by something racy and Italian. Bianchis and (_)/ (_) | Colnagos are a lot cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris. -- Glenn Davies