On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> > Hi,
> > since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of
> > tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex.
> > [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ??
> I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.
> This works fine. The only minor problems I have seen
> is when the debian-packaged texlive lacks some package
> I want, that was distributed with debian's tetex. This have only
> happened a couple of times, and of course the missing stuff
> worked when I added it to /usr/local.
Heck, I haven't even noticed that. LyX works fine with texlive, in fact I
went to texlive as suggested here about 6 months ago to get rid of a tetex
bug (as packaged in debian etch, at least). Absolutely no issues with
texlive and lyx. In what sense is tetex required for lyx?
--
David L. Johnson
__o | Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics, I can
_`\(,_ | assure you that mine are all greater. -- A. Einstein
(_)/ (_) |
