On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:24:23AM +0000, Stefan Schimanski wrote: > Everything looks great .... until I try to edit the arguments of the > macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with several line > prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is it supposed to work > like that?
Sort of, yes. So far no better idea has been proposed/implemented. > Especially if you nest math-macros in your formulas this > style of editing makes it unusable because you easily completely loose > track of the structure of your formula. > > Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some > placeholder boxes as the arguments? Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious. Macro arguments can be used more than once. > Although I don't know LyX's rendering code, it doesn't look to be much > more complicated. But maybe I am wrong. Just try to implement something better. If it works out, we should use that. Andre'
