Finally solved thanks, in part, to the archive of the list. I "forgot"
to add a parameter to the first item in the second subenvironment. The
final result should be:

ERT:\newcounter{saveenum}
(a) Environment "a"
1. ....
2. .... ERT:\setcounter{saveenum}{\value{enumii}}
(b) Environment "b"
3. ERT:[\number\value{saveenum}]\setcounter{enumii}{\value{saveenum}} ....
4. ....

Check that you can't use the counter "saveenum" directly, so you have
to convert it into a "number".

Hope this helps someone besides me... ;)

On 4/17/07, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I should have been using "enumii" instead of "enumi". That piece of
the puzzle is solved, but  now another issue arises:

ERT:\newcounter{saveenum}
(a) Environment "a"
1. ....
2. .... ERT:\setcounter{saveenum}{\value{enumii}}
(b) Environment "b" ERT:\setcounter{enumii}{\value{saveenum}}
1. ....
2. ....

If I use it this way, as you can see, it does nothing.

ERT:\newcounter{saveenum}
(a) Environment "a"
1. ....
2. .... ERT:\setcounter{saveenum}{\value{enumii}}
(b) Environment "b"
1. ERT:\setcounter{enumii}{\value{saveenum}} ....
3. ....

And if I use the last ERT before the first line of text in the second
sub-environment, the first line shows "1" and the secon starts with
the following item in the counter.

Any ideas on how can I solve it without doing a huge chunk of LaTeX code?
On 4/17/07, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While using a numbering environment I would like to keep the number of
> items to start numbering another list from that item on. For example:
>
> (a) Environment "a"
> 1. ....
> 2. ....
> (b) Environment "b"
> 3. ....
> 4. ....
>
> I tried using a counter the following way:
>
> ERT:\newcounter{saveenum}
> (a) Environment "a"
> 1. ....
> 2. .... ERT:\setcounter{saveenum}{\value{enumi}}
> (b) Environment "b" ERT:\setcounter{enumi}{\value{saveenum}}
> 1. ....
> 2. ....
>
>
> The list, as you can see, starts again from one instead of keep the
> numbering in the counter. Is this a problem of where the ERT should be
> placed? I would really like to solve this with as less LaTeX code as
> possible.
>
> Thx in advance...
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------
> Julio Rojas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


--
-------------------------------------------------
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
-------------------------------------------------
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to