On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using ‘sudo make install’ I just entered ‘make
install’. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under Qt4.2.3, but I got the same error
message
when trying Qt4.3.0snapshot ‘qt 4 library not found’. A bug report
would be
great, I really want to see if Qt4.3 is faster. Thanks for the info.
Bob
I guess the problem is that we need to figure out whether it is a QT
or an LyX-issue...
It is interesting that your compilation works? Do you have more info
on your configuration? My fails on 10.4.9 (G4). with gcc 4.0.1,
automake 1.10 and gettext 0.14.5.
But I will try again to make sure I didn't do something stupid.
/Anders
I'm using 10.4.9 (G3) with gcc 4.0.1, automake 1.9.6, and gettext
0.14.5. I
really don't know if it's an LyX or Qt issue. The only thing I
noticed was
that my qt4.3.0 directory is missing a mkspecs folder that is in
qt4.2.3
even though they were compiled with the same ./configure command. I
guess
I'll send a configure log to the development list.
Bob
Do that. The problem is also reported in the tread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg113399.html
It seems our configurations are similar apart from the automake
version. Still I get an error with:
/usr/bin/ld: can't locate file for: -lQtAssistantClient
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [../../bin/qtdemo.app/Contents/MacOS/qtdemo] Error 1
make[1]: *** [sub-qtdemo-make_default] Error 2
make: *** [sub-demos-make_default-ordered] Error 2
The only explanation I can think of is if you compiled QT with the -
nomake demos. That should probably avoid this error (I will try it
now), but of course that doesn't solve the basic problem of compiling
LyX...
/Anders
