Helge Hafting wrote: > Daniel Lohmann wrote: >> Tim Michelsen wrote: >> >>> Very good point. I often do get the comment that I should run the spell >>> checker. But it takes the same amount of time to check with the Lyx >>> spell checker and train it all the technical terms as >>> printing and correcting it manually. >>> >> >> Especially if you write a lot of code, which it always tries to >> spell-check as well... >> > This is a problem. High on the 1.6 wishlist is a "no language" > language. LyX should then skip anything in this language > when spellchecking. Apply this to computer code and such > and be fine. . .
Sounds good! Of course it has to become not only a paragraph property, but also applicable to character classes and, hopefully, to arbitrary selections of text. I can easily skip a complete paragraph of code during spell checking. However, in some of my texts every second sentence mentions an identifier of the program. These are the elements I would love to assign "no language". Daniel
