rgheck wrote:
> I would myself be happy to see a way of getting that kind of information
> into the child even when just compiling it. Otherwise, you have to use
> ugly hacks to get your macros into the child in this case. 

Yoe mean, apart from master-buffer-[view|update]?

> I guess what we really need is \includeonly support, as several people have 
> said.

Indeed. But this would be an orthogonal feature.

Jürgen


Reply via email to