It would appear that on Aug 19, Pavel Sanda did say: > is there still anybody around using the old classic.ui we distribute?
That would be me... > its not maintained for a longer time, without new features and with bugs > as the lfuns are changing, so i tend to remove it for the next release. [rant-mode] Well I guess I'll say thanks for the warning... As it happens it's the only ui I've ever intentionally used. I don't even really know why I automatically selected it unless it's because every single time I've seen any changes to any kind of user interface I've grown accustomed to, I've always been disappointed because somehow it's always the features I personally like to use that gets obsoleted... This doesn't surprise me much any more. And I've long since given up trying to figure out how they know which features I like so that the can avoid obsoleting anything I don't happen to use... It's kind of like how do the Neilsons know when I've discovered a TV show I like enough to watch on purpose. But they obviously do, as the moment I start liking a show it's days are numbered... <sigh> [/rant-mode] But seriously, I'm not sure what the difference is between the .ui files. If your going to remove the "clasic.ui" could you tell me which remaining .ui file results in the closest match to the actual user interface? -- | ~^~ ~^~ | <?> <?> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | \___/ <<[email protected]>>
