On 2010-04-13, Typhoon wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:02:23 -0400
> rgheck <rgh...@bobjweil.com> wrote:

>> On 04/13/2010 10:43 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> > rgheck wrote:

>> > I also think that VC probably provides all you need for
>> > collaboration (although a closer integration of VC, comparision and
>> > CT would be cool).

Also, a version control (VC) system provides at the same time the "time
machine" to keep track of the evolution of your documents.

>> > For me, a main obstacle is the lack of a suitable web service. 

> What about using a distributed version control system? I use Bazaar to
> collaborate with one of my colleagues. We meed every so often to do a
> double merge and it works really well. No central server is needed,
> although if you have one available then you can use it like svn.

I use Git to keep a local VC repository so I strongly favour the option
to support distributed version control from LyX.


Reply via email to