On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Michael Joyner wrote:
> > Theorem modules and Linguistic modules conflict?
> >
> > I am needing to use both the Theorem modules along with the Linguistic
> > modules and I get the following error when trying to include both:
> >
> > \newtheorem{example}
> >
> > {Example}[chapter]
> >
> > Your command was ignored.
>
> I am not using "example" from the theorem's module. Is there a way to
undefine it so that I might be able to use the covington example?
I use the "problem" and "exercise" from the theorem's module only.
You can't use a covington example (from the linguistics module) with an
> example theorem, obviously, since both attempt to define \example.
>
> There's nothing we can do from the linguistics POV, since \example is
> hardcoded in the covington package. We could rename the example theorem,
> but I
> fear such conflicts are generally hard to avoid.
>
> Jürgen
>
