Rethinking on everything, I think the problem is biber. It seems that
it cannot process your bibtex file, which is why the citekey, not the
properly formatted reference, appears. You need to check both, your
bibtex file as well as your biber installation. BTW, why biber?
-------------------------------------------------
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, as I don't have biber I have to remove most of your references
> and only left the first one, which works perfectly with bibtex.
>
> Regards.
> -------------------------------------------------
> Julio Rojas
> jcredbe...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Try the attached document (change the bibliography path accordingly).
>> I will remind you that I don't use biber, so I don't know if the
>> problem lies there.
>>
>> Regards.
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Julio Rojas
>> jcredbe...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Louis Turk <l...@dayspringpublisher.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Julio,
>>>
>>> On 08/14/2011 11:30 PM, Julio Rojas wrote:
>>>
>>> As for the footnotes, you first have to use a biblatex style that
>>> automatically makes use of "\footcite". For this, you need to add the
>>> "citestyle" option
>>> citestyle=verbose-trad1 .
>>>
>>> If in the preamble I use
>>>
>>> \usepackage[notes,autocite=footnote,natbib,citestyle=verbose-trad1]{biblatex-chicago}
>>>
>>> I get this error message:
>>>
>>> Package keyval Error: citestyle undefined.
>>>
>>> ...liographyOptions\expandafter{\cms@options}
>>>
>>> What I usually do is that I renew a command
>>> like "\citep" into "\autocite" adding the following command to the
>>> preamble:
>>>
>>> \renewcommand\citep{\autocite}
>>>
>>> If I use:
>>>
>>> \usepackage[notes,autocite=footnote,natbib]{biblatex-chicago}
>>>
>>> \renewcommand\citep{\autocite}
>>>
>>> \bibliography{/home/lat/notes-test}
>>>
>>> only the bibtexkey prints, not the text it points to.
>>>
>>> As for the lack of references in the footnotes, it might be due to the
>>> lack of the bibliography's full path in the preamble.
>>>
>>> As you can see above, I'm using the correct full path to the bibliography
>>> file, but still no success.
>>>
>>> I suspect that we are getting close though. Thanks for the help!
>>>
>>> Louis
>>>
>>> Try this and let me know. Regards.
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>> Julio Rojas
>>>
>>
>
