Am 05.01.2012 um 10:02 schrieb Jerry:

> 
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jerry wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> 
>>> I've prepared a LyX-package with Qt-4.8.0 and the upload is here:
>>> 
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0-cocoa.dmg
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0svn%2Bqt4.8.0-cocoa.dmg.sig
>>> 
>>> The Qt 4.8.0 ChangeLog contains this:
>>> 
>>> Qt for Mac OS X
>>> ---------------
>>> - Alien widgets is now used by default for Qt/Cocoa on Mac OS X. 
>>> - Qt/Cocoa on Mac OS X has now full support for the raster paint engine.
>>> - QApplication has now implemented macEventFilter for Qt/Cocoa
>>> - HarfBuzz can now be used as an optional text layout engine on Mac OS X. 
>>> [QTBUG-17728]
>>> - Qt shows some love to OS X Lion (10.7).
>>> 
>>> Perhaps this is an improvement on Lion? Please, can someone give it a try?
>>> 
>>> Stephan
>> 
>> 10.6.8, 2.1svn
>> Scrolling User's Guide takes 13 seconds.
>> No misplaced cursor.
>> 
>> This scroll rate is between what I measured for 2.0.0 and 2.0.2 using the 
>> special preference file line.
>> 
>> Subjectively, for me, the somewhat slower difference for 2.1svn puts the 
>> experience back into "painful" regime, but it is still better than 2.0.2 
>> without the special preference file line.
>> 
>> Jerry
> 
> After adding \force_paint_single_char false to the preferences file for 
> 2.1svn:
> Scrolling User's Guide takes 9 seconds on first pass, 7-8 seconds for 
> subsequent passes.
> The cursor is misplaced on long line of m's.
> 
> Another artifact with these conditions appears: when click-dragging over text 
> to select it, _some_ letters at and to the right of the position of the 
> cursor will jump a few pixels left and right as the cursor passes over them. 
> Doing this over a long line of m's is especially fun. It's as though 
> characters under the selection color are being drawn with a different metric 
> than the ones that have not been selected yet.
> 
> Normal scrolling (trackpad, thumb bar) is noticeably better than any of the 
> other results I have reported. But the cursor problem is present now.

Thank you for doing this job. So, at least there is some hope :)

Stephan

Reply via email to