On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer wrote:

<snip>

We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust with
magic documentation and free specialists that will fix your problem or
tell you what to do on demand. It doesn't always work out that way,
though. Tough.

You think you are owed an explanation of how everything you download and
run works. That could be a mistake. These licenses generally state, "AS
IS WITH NO WARRANTY OR MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE". Its usually printed all or in part in all captial letters.

If there is something that you want to see happen in free software, and
the developers who are working for free (or paid by someone else to work
on it contrary to your interests) aren't doing it, or aren't doing it
fast enough to suit you, and you cannot or will not do it yourself, you
still have recourse. It works similarly to, but not quite the same as,
the proprietary model.

Pay someone to do it for you. Then you'll have someone obligated to put
up with your whinging.

That is not us.

This is all the time I have for this reply.

Which is the same amount of time you have to do anything other than to tell others what to do, as if they needed your advice.

--

Attachment: 0xCCE82347.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to