>>>>> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Alejandro> On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Fred Hucht wrote:

>> You're welcome! I love it, I even misuse it a bit. Example: I need
>> a \sum with a prime, i.e.  ---' in LaTeX, this is a bit tricky, the
>> clean solution in Knuth's \ TeX book has 8 lines hard TeX. Hence I
>> defined a macro in LyX / (simply containing \sum') and
>> renewcommand'ed it below to the --- real TeX code. So I have a
>> readable primed sum in LyX and a perfect one in the output. It
>> would be nice when the macro code would allow such a redefinition,
>> more than half of my macros are redefined in this way...

Alejandro> Is not this contradictory to your suggestion to have all
Alejandro> the macros in the preamble?

Any macro could have *two* definitions: a GUI one (generated by
mathed), and a LaTeX one, which defaults to the visible one. An
additional possibility would be not to output any \newcommand, to
handle the case where the macro is defined by the documentclass, but
mathed does not know about it.

Wouldn't this make everybody happy?

JMarc

Reply via email to