> Would it be possible to allow people to subscibe read-only to the > lists, in order to be informed about what happens to the list? This > could be a daily digest... > > I think it is important that the development of LyX be as tranparent > as possible. It is IMO the best way to attract new developpers. And we > need some. I agree. Also, maybe it would be a good time to rename the cvs branches: Maybe lyxdevel lyxstable lyxdoc relyx Of course the lyxstable might not be extremely stable at all times, but in general it will be stable enough. Greets, Asger
- Nazgul is dead Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Nazgul is dead Peter Suetterlin
- Re: Nazgul is dead Mate Wierdl
- Re: Nazgul is dead Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Garst R. Reese
- Re: Nazgul is dead Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Allan Rae
- Re: Nazgul is dead Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Nazgul is dead Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Nazgul is dead Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Nazgul is dead Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Nazgul is dead Allan Rae
- Re: Nazgul is dead Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
