On 10/13/2009 03:33, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
Dear Jon,
Thank you for the patch, but I'm afraid I can't accept it by a number of
reasons.
It is too intrusive. I am pretty sure lines like this
snprintf( buf, sizeof buf, "%"LZIPLL"d %s", num, p );
will break compilation on some other systems.
It is for a system too different from posix systems, and there is at
least a way of compiling lzip in windows that does not need to obscure
the code with conditional compilation constructs; Cygwin.
Hi,
I just found a massive thinko with my previous patches, not sure why it
worked at all. In the mean time, I'll still try to find a less intrusive
method.
I have to agree, your code does look clean from a POSIX perspective,
thanks for your input.
_______________________________________________
Lzip-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lzip-bug
