mm's! That would be great.

-- 
.-. .-. . . .   .-. .  .
`-. |   |-| |   |-  |\/|
`-' `-' ' ` `-' `-' '  `

http://flavors.me/schlem#_

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:38 PM, David Flippo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you want the dimensions in inches or mm's?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Todd Schlemmer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Well then, the bad news is I have no way of confirming dimensions on the
> 102 batter cover.  The good news is that I have an STL for a model 100
> battery cover that I am test printing.
>
>
>
> --
> .-. .-. . . .   .-. .  .
> `-. |   |-| |   |-  |\/|
> `-' `-' ' ` `-' `-' '  `
>
> http://flavors.me/schlem#_
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Todd Schlemmer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I just opened this STL up and it has a few issues.  First and foremost,
>> does
>> > the battery cover differ in size between the model 100 and 102?  It
>> looks
>> > like this STL was modeled in inches, but when I import it, it is too be
>> > compared to my 100's battery cover.  Also, there are some defects in the
>> > shape of the tabs.  I am trying to repair (the file is a great head
>> start),
>> > but I can't promise anything usable in the near future. I have a lot
>> going
>> > on this month.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> The T102 and M100 battery covers are different.
>>
>> -- John.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to