I have both covers M100 & M102 I'll measure the M102 with my digital caliper. I'll get back to you!
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 4, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Todd Schlemmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > mm's! That would be great. > > > -- > .-. .-. . . . .-. . . > `-. | |-| | |- |\/| > `-' `-' ' ` `-' `-' ' ` > > http://flavors.me/schlem#_ > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:38 PM, David Flippo <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do you want the dimensions in inches or mm's? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Todd Schlemmer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Well then, the bad news is I have no way of confirming dimensions on the >>> 102 batter cover. The good news is that I have an STL for a model 100 >>> battery cover that I am test printing. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> .-. .-. . . . .-. . . >>> `-. | |-| | |- |\/| >>> `-' `-' ' ` `-' `-' ' ` >>> >>> http://flavors.me/schlem#_ >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Todd Schlemmer <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I just opened this STL up and it has a few issues. First and foremost, >>>> > does >>>> > the battery cover differ in size between the model 100 and 102? It looks >>>> > like this STL was modeled in inches, but when I import it, it is too be >>>> > compared to my 100's battery cover. Also, there are some defects in the >>>> > shape of the tabs. I am trying to repair (the file is a great head >>>> > start), >>>> > but I can't promise anything usable in the near future. I have a lot >>>> > going >>>> > on this month. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> The T102 and M100 battery covers are different. >>>> >>>> -- John. >
